A cynic would say that in the stand-off between Willy Gnonto and Leeds United, some of the timing has looked less than accidental.
It was 24 hours before Leeds’ game at Birmingham City, with the team bus about to leave the training ground, when Gnonto told Daniel Farke he was adamant about leaving the club and would not make the trip to St Andrew’s. It was 90 minutes before kick-off against West Bromwich Albion on Friday when his restlessness manifested itself in a formal written transfer request. If maximum disruption was not intentional, it threatened that effect regardless.
Attention on Gnonto’s future has been building for a fortnight and an official demand to quit Elland Road was a fresh test of Leeds’ determination to dig their heels in and prevent the winger from getting his way. But the reaction of their crowd to him was a warning to the club that any plans to retain, reset and reintegrate Gnonto would be fraught with difficulty, leaving their board between a rock and a hard place. The ownership at Leeds do not want to be dictated to by Gnonto, but nor can they afford to cut off their nose to spite their face.
The transfer deadline is less than two weeks away and Gnonto and Leeds are entrenched: Gnonto seemingly insistent on finding a way out of Leeds while the club tell him at every turn that he will not be sold. So where is this going and how is the saga likely to end? And will Leeds, when it comes to the crunch, feel compelled to take the money and run?
What is the state of play?
Gnonto has not checked out fully in the sense he is still in Leeds and still training at Thorp Arch, but he has been working in isolation since refusing to travel to Birmingham on August 11.
Leeds’ head coach, Daniel Farke, was solely responsible for sidelining him from first-team sessions, with the full support of the club’s board. Gnonto is using a separate changing room to the senior squad and has seen his schedule set for times when the main group are not present. The same is true of Luis Sinisterra amid a separate dispute over the terms of the Colombian’s contract.
Gnonto’s desire to move elsewhere has seen him miss United’s last three games, the first a Carabao Cup tie against Shrewsbury Town. While Leeds and Farke showed him some understanding after the Shrewsbury game, allowing him to continue participating in full training for the next 48 hours and offering him a chance to clear his head, his refusal to go to Birmingham was a different matter. Having initially said very little about his situation, the club promptly issued a statement explaining Gnonto’s withdrawal. Farke decided at that point that Gnonto could no longer be involved in his day-to-day plans.
GO DEEPER
What it really like to be frozen out like Mesut Ozil
As yet, Leeds made no further comment nor addressed Friday’s transfer request publicly, but news of the request spread before kick-off against West Brom and the crowd at Elland Road were unforgiving in their criticism of him. However much heat Leeds have taken for the way the summer has gone as a whole, it is obvious to everyone — Gnonto included — whose side the fanbase are taking in this dispute. A previously popular footballer is now the target of ire.
There is frustration within United’s hierarchy with the way Gnonto and his camp have handled the past couple of weeks, not least over things like the timing of his formal transfer request on the night of a match. Farke’s history as a coach made it highly likely that he would respond by ostracising Gnonto from his squad. In the past, the German has shown near zero tolerance for anyone trying to force their way out of a club.
Why does Gnonto want to leave?
When Leeds signed him from FC Zurich last summer, Gnonto was an 18-year-old forward with a small profile in Europe — despite the fact he was in the process of breaking into the Italy squad at the time. A big part of the reason Leeds were able to pick him up for such a low fee, less than £5million ($6.4m), was because firm interest in him was minimal.
As a result, Gnonto is nothing like the highest earner at Elland Road and as has been widely reported, Leeds’ squad were subject to major wage reductions in the wake of relegation last season. He remains on his original contract and it is evident a move to a Premier League side like Everton would earn him a substantial rise in salary.
But some of his motivation for wanting to depart revolves around his international prospects. Gnonto has been under the impression that to have the best chance of making Italy’s squad for next summer’s European Championship, he needs to be turning out in one of Europe’s top leagues. Championship football might compromise his prospects, although the landscape in Italy is changing significantly. Roberto Mancini, the coach who gave Gnonto his international debut, resigned as Italy boss 10 days ago.
Leeds initially hoped that they would be able to talk an unhappy Gnonto round quickly; that through a bit of hasty mediation and diplomacy, they would be able to put the controversy around him down to youth and inexperience. But the conscious decision to follow up a refusal to travel with a written transfer request made the point that backing out of the match at St Andrew’s was no momentary wobble. Friday’s events have intensified the doubt about whether the club can stick to their guns and insist that he stays put.
What is Leeds United’s stance?
Gnonto’s future was always an elephant in the room this summer — the question of whether the combination of his better performances in the Premier League and Leeds’ relegation would turn his head to other opportunities — but it did not become an active topic of conversation at Elland Road until after their first game of the season against Cardiff City.
Gnonto started that match and played well, but in the days that followed, he began to intimate his desire to look at his options. Straight away, United made it clear they had no intention of losing him, leading Gnonto to miss the Shrewsbury tie due to questions about his mindset. Leeds’ message was forcefully reiterated for a second time after he pulled out of their defeat at Birmingham City and their stance is yet to soften.
GO DEEPER
‘I’d rather shoot you than sell you’: How to get players to stay in a transfer window
For one thing, the strongest interest in Gnonto has come from Everton but none of their offers have been high enough to tempt Leeds’ hierarchy to take the money. The largest bid yet was a total package worth £25million, a big increase on the fee Leeds paid to Zurich for him but not a sum they see as market value. United took note of Romeo Lavia leaving Southampton for Chelsea for an initial £53million, a year after he switched to the south coast from Manchester City. While Lavia started more games in the Premier League than Gnonto, he has a total of 29 top-flight appearances to Gnonto’s 25, Gnonto has the added credentials of being a full Italy international.
Moreover, Leeds do not want Gnonto to set a precedent of under-contract footballers getting what they want irrespective of the club’s wishes. It looks too much like the tail wagging the dog. The fact Gnonto has no release clause in his deal means he is not entitled to a transfer before next week’s deadline. And while Leeds have been powerless to prevent so many of the exits seen at Elland Road since May, the consequence of exit provisions included in other deals, Gnonto is a different case entirely. The club’s new ownership do not want to be seen to be bullied in a scenario where the power is technically theirs.
What is clear to them, though, is that the faltering relationship between Gnonto and their crowd is complicating matters. There were chants against him from the away end at Birmingham and more again at home to West Brom on Friday, all of it symptomatic of bridges being burned. People are intolerant of these situations at the best of times but Leeds are regrouping after two draining campaigns and a return to the EFL, not to mention a summer in which the inclination of players to walk away from the mess has been rife.
So while the club regard Gnonto as a major asset, there is no denying this has become more and more politically awkward. And it was worrying yesterday to see criticism of him cross the lining by descending into racist abuse on social media. Leeds still owe it to him to fight against bigotry like that, however much they are at odds contractually. And they are very aware that at 19, he is still a young man.
A racist comment made on social media towards Willy Gnonto has been brought to our attention. #LUFC condemn this action in the strongest possible way.
— Leeds United (@LUFC) August 21, 2023
How serious is Everton’s interest?
Gnonto was linked with Atalanta and Roma over the weekend, but so far, the serious approaches for him have come from Goodison Park. Everton rate Gnonto highly and he has been a target for them all summer, but they are not awash with cash and Leeds have been resistant to their offers.
Goodison Park offers Gnonto Premier League football, for this season at least, but Everton have been in the business of staving off relegation for a while now and having lost their first game of the season against Fulham, they were trounced by Aston Villa on Sunday, punished for a performance minus any redeeming features. That early form casts Everton as an odd move for Gnonto, with a high chance he would be pitching himself into another relegation battle.
Were Leeds minded to think Gnonto would ultimately leave for Merseyside, they might have quietly hinted to Everton what sort of valuation they would be willing to consider. But they have given Everton no encouragement, rejecting bids out of hand. It is far from clear if Everton have the money to go further or far enough to force the issue.
What chance of Farke reintegrating Gnonto?
Farke is a hard-liner when it comes to player discipline and reputations don’t seem to make much difference to his principles. It is no secret that at Norwich City, both Todd Cantwell and Emi Buendia — key members of the Farke era at Carrow Road — spent time training alone after transfer speculation left him questioning their professionalism and attitude.
It is also well known that in the end, both Cantwell and Buendia returned to the fold and played a major part in Norwich’s promotion that same season. Farke might have been a disciplinarian, but he was not in the business of cutting off his nose to spite his face. Over time, the data showed that Cantwell and Buendia were working hard and genuinely putting the effort in. The result was an olive branch from the German.
On that basis, it is fair to assume there are circumstances in which Farke would be willing to do the same with Gnonto. And the idea of finding a way to mend the relationship with Gnonto, thereby giving Farke use of him again, is an active part of discussions at Elland Road. His talent is worth the effort but it cannot happen for as long as the winger maintains his stance of wanting out and swerving games. And it could only happen with Farke’s blessing.
Leeds and Farke would also have to contend with the reality of a crowd who have not taken Gnonto’s actions lightly. Suffice it to say, any redemption arc would have to be skilfully managed and would surely require contrition on the part of the winger. But stranger things have happened.
How will this end?
The answer to that in this window depends largely on who bids what before the deadline passes. Leeds have been resolute in refusing to sell Gnonto and they know how it will look if they give in to a low-ball approach as the September 1 cut-off draws near. Moreover, they have not given up on the possibility that, despite everything, he stays and resets.
At the same time, Gnonto’s value has an upper limit. There is a price at which it makes no sense to keep an unhappy player against his will and, from a PR perspective, Leeds would not be damaged by being seen to make good money on a footballer who is trying to get himself out of the club.
In the boardroom they will be mindful of two things: firstly, of not being seen to come off second-best in this dispute. And secondly, to make sure that if they do opt to cash in on Gnonto, they do so in a way that leaves enough time to use the funds rationally. Because effective incomings are paramount in what is left of the window.
(Top photo: Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images)