Choosing between David Moyes and Julen Lopetegui isn’t really much of a choice at all. I’m aware that I don’t speak for everyone, but for me, it’s like asking whether I’d prefer to be punched or kicked.
During our earlier poll, I described the selection as a magician’s choice; however, Hobson’s choice may well be more apt. The definition of both is the illusion of an apparently free choice when there is no real alternative or only equally objectionable alternatives.
In this instance, the question was whether you’d prefer unadventurous manager A or B. It’s an unfair choice because the majority of people who would like to see David Moyes replaced as West Ham manager would ideally like his successor play with a youthful and attacking team. Lopetegui it appears does neither.
For those who wish to know, the poll is running at roughly 55% in favour of David Moyes; however, David Sullivan would be wise not to read too much into this statistic. I’m cautious and mindful that the results may imply that the majority of the fanbase are happy with the current style of play.
The poll result is certainly no endorsement or validation of Moyes’ incredibly pragmatic outlook on games, which sees us set up as fearfully against Sheffield United as we do against Manchester City. Many fans, including myself, have grown frustrated by seeing advantageous positions in matches thrown away during the second halves of games.
Moyes is frequently outsmarted by younger, shrewder, and more tactically malleable coaches who switch tactics and substitutes, which then turn a favourable lead for West Ham into a victory for the opposition.
Perhaps the whole charade is set up for a claim that attempts were made to recruit other managers, but Moyes was the last man standing. If that is the case, and the illusion of choice is used against the West Ham fans as it was with the appointment of Manuel Pellegrini, it may take a lot more than pulling a rabbit out of a hat to appease those who feel duped.